Advertising Assessment - Learner Response
Learner Response
1) WWW = Good comparisons of the two texts.
EBI = Relevance and discussion of the "socially liberal media".
2) Question 1 = Black tie as a phallic object (Mulvey) – being grabbed by female model.
Question 2 = Armani advert arguably reflects the ‘crisis of masculinity’ some refer to – assertively
heterosexual, perhaps reflecting the struggle men face to find their place/role in the 21st
century. Armani captures the way men wish to see the world.
Question 3 = Van Zoonen argues that gender and the media is a process of negotiation – it is part of social discourse (part of discussion and debate in society). This supports the idea of change and identities becoming more fluid.
3) . Stereotypical ideals of beauty – slim, twenty-something, white.
. Promise of irresistible appeal – ‘sex sells’ (common narrative in men’s grooming; Barthes’
action code).
. Costume barely visible for female models – flesh on display. Heavily made-up faces –
constructed/Photoshopped image. Links to Kilbourne’s analysis of women in advertising.
4) I need to revise : . Context of life in 1960
. Gauntlett
. Judith Butler
. Equal Pay Act
5) For - The fact so many major corporations are running socially liberal campaigns demonstrates that companies see future or acceptance of identity fluidity.
- Digital technology is allowing individuals to identify with different interpretations of
masculinity or indeed reject the concept of masculinity entirely. Maybelline campaign
reflects this.
Against - Van Zoonen argues that media language constructs gender and that this largely reinforces
traditional gender stereotypes. This would suggest gender identities are still largely
restrictive and not as liberal as Gauntlett may suggest.
- Identity is now a ‘culture war’ issue divided on partisan lines. Therefore, it could be argued that an acceptance of liberal and fluid identities is still some way off.
Comments
Post a Comment